Comments on: “Peaceful Protesters” but no “Peaceful Police” https://nickm.com/post/2020/06/peaceful-protesters-but-no-peaceful-police/ Nick Montfort Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:40:54 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 By: Nick Montfort https://nickm.com/post/2020/06/peaceful-protesters-but-no-peaceful-police/comment-page-1/#comment-937216 Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:40:54 +0000 https://nickm.com/post/?p=4998#comment-937216 I was referring to the approximately 10x as many Google search results for “peaceful protesters” as opposed to “violent protesters.” I agree that (at least) 99 of 100 of peaceful. I’dd be glad to know how I can write more clearly here.

]]>
By: robert WELDON https://nickm.com/post/2020/06/peaceful-protesters-but-no-peaceful-police/comment-page-1/#comment-937215 Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:38:09 +0000 https://nickm.com/post/?p=4998#comment-937215 “One in ten protesters are not violent in any objective sense.” typo? It’s more like 99 out of 100.

]]>
By: Nick Montfort https://nickm.com/post/2020/06/peaceful-protesters-but-no-peaceful-police/comment-page-1/#comment-937206 Mon, 08 Jun 2020 21:44:30 +0000 https://nickm.com/post/?p=4998#comment-937206 On Language Log, Mark Liberman makes a good point: The modifier “peaceful” could be employed not (only) because of markedness, or even emphasis, but because

the conceptual framework is actually based on the logic of police reaction. If protests are violent, then a proportionate use of force by the police may be seen as justified. If the protests are peaceful, a violent police reaction is seen as wrong. And even in cases where there’s no police violence, the context is one where the behavior of the protesters is seen as relevant — not because protestor violence is the default, but because the lack of police action needs an explanation, or because the writer is emphasizing the perceived cause of police restraint.

]]>