Comments on: Review of 10 PRINT in Slate, New Ports/Variants https://nickm.com/post/2012/11/review-of-10-print-in-slate-new-portvariant/ Nick Montfort Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:43:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 By: Huseyin Kilic https://nickm.com/post/2012/11/review-of-10-print-in-slate-new-portvariant/comment-page-1/#comment-15493 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:43:30 +0000 http://nickm.com/post/?p=2817#comment-15493 13 bytes version in 6502 machine code:

7C 00 20 D2 FF A1 85 29 01 E9 92 D0 F5

(Please note that the first two bytes are actually required by .prg file format to indicate load address. The actual code is 11 bytes).

For more information:

http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=60810

]]> By: Daniel Haehn https://nickm.com/post/2012/11/review-of-10-print-in-slate-new-portvariant/comment-page-1/#comment-15362 Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:20:36 +0000 http://nickm.com/post/?p=2817#comment-15362 Andrew, that looks great!! Thanks for sharing!

]]> By: Andrew Plotkin https://nickm.com/post/2012/11/review-of-10-print-in-slate-new-portvariant/comment-page-1/#comment-15326 Sun, 02 Dec 2012 02:41:09 +0000 http://nickm.com/post/?p=2817#comment-15326 Daniel Haehn’s 3D version was not satisfying to me, so I dug in and figure out what I thought it should look like:

http://eblong.com/zarf/essays/10-print-3d.html

This retains the spirit of the original, in this sense: it divides space into a grid of cubes; each cube contains a rotation of a single shape; the whole mass forms a series of intertwining, twisty tunnels. Of course it’s much harder to follow an individual tunnel, unless you have 4D eyes.

You can see what the individual cell shape looks like by turning up the “Spacing” slider. There are eight rotations — or rather, four rotations and four mirror-reflections of them.

]]>