Comments on: Bergen Apothegma, Part 1 http://nickm.com/post/2009/11/bergen-apothegma-part-1/ Nick Montfort Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:05:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Post Position » Bergen Apothegma, Part 2 http://nickm.com/post/2009/11/bergen-apothegma-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-975 Post Position » Bergen Apothegma, Part 2 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:06:44 +0000 http://nickm.com/post/?p=522#comment-975 <p>[...] but they were rich in provocation and new ideas, and now I have to post something to follow “part 1.” The workshop went very well; particularly good were two long evenings of electronic literature, [...]</p> [...] but they were rich in provocation and new ideas, and now I have to post something to follow “part 1.” The workshop went very well; particularly good were two long evenings of electronic literature, [...]

]]> By: Victor Gijsbers http://nickm.com/post/2009/11/bergen-apothegma-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-970 Victor Gijsbers Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:38:38 +0000 http://nickm.com/post/?p=522#comment-970 <p>"If there were going to be a great novel or a great poem in new media by now, we’d have it."</p> <p>I suspect you have misquoted Joseph Tabbi by misplacing the comma?</p> <p>"If there were going to be a great novel or a great poem in new media, by now we’d have it."</p> <p>makes a lot more sense.</p> “If there were going to be a great novel or a great poem in new media by now, we’d have it.”

I suspect you have misquoted Joseph Tabbi by misplacing the comma?

“If there were going to be a great novel or a great poem in new media, by now we’d have it.”

makes a lot more sense.

]]> By: Jill Walker Rettberg http://nickm.com/post/2009/11/bergen-apothegma-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-969 Jill Walker Rettberg Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:45:52 +0000 http://nickm.com/post/?p=522#comment-969 <p>Thank you, Nick for making me look up two different words that apparently mean almost the same thing. I like the strategy as opposed to the dense summary.</p> Thank you, Nick for making me look up two different words that apparently mean almost the same thing. I like the strategy as opposed to the dense summary.

]]>